A scan of the excitation wavelength from 335-435 showed the highest absorption at 399 nm, so the excitation monochromator was set for that value. Then the emission scan was performed from 450-550 nm, and the strongest signal was found to be at 520 nm. These are the wavelengths that are used for all of the samples.
|
Sample |
Fluorescence Intensity |
Corrected Fluorescence Intensity |
|
Blank |
0.008 |
0.000 |
|
Sample |
0.128 |
0.120 |
|
Sample + 1 mL |
0.167 |
0.159 |
|
Sample + 2 mL |
0.220 |
0.212 |
|
Sample + 3 mL |
0.260 |
0.252 |
|
Sample + 4 mL |
0.290 |
0.282 |
A plot of fluorescence (Figure 3) vs. µg of Al3+ added (Figure 4) yielded a least-squares line of:
Fluorescence Intensity = 0.0417 x (µg of Al3+ added) + 0.1216
Amount of Al3+ = -(Y-Int)/Slope = -0.1216/0.0417 = -2.916 µg/mL
Since the amount of unknown added was 25 mL, then the 2.916 µg/mL value needs to be divided by 25.
Unknown Aluminum Concentration = 2.916 µg/mL / 25.0 mL = 0.117 µg/mL = 0.117 ppm
which is quite close to the actual value of 0.110 ppm (6.4% error).

Figure 1.Graphic representation of method of standard addition.

Figure 2.Determining optimum EX and EM Wavelengths.

Figure 3. Fluorescence of the samples.

Figure 4. The standard addition calibration plot.